Home » Video: Akpabio, Oshiomhole clash over new senate eligibility rules

Video: Akpabio, Oshiomhole clash over new senate eligibility rules

0
Screenshot_20260506_220521

Abdullateef Fowewe

Tension gripped the Nigerian Senate today as Senate President Godswill Akpabio clashed l with Senator Adams Oshiomhole (Edo North) during confirmation of Tuesday’s votes and proceedings.

The confrontation, just 24 hours after the chamber amended its standing rules to bar senators without two consecutive terms from leadership roles, saw Oshiomhole’s bid for a point of order repeatedly ignored.

The new rules effectively block Oshiomhole from contesting presiding offices in the 11th Senate, limiting eligibility to those with at least eight years of uninterrupted service.

This follows a three-hour closed-door session amid rumours that figures like Hope Uzodimma, Ifeanyi Okowa, and Ovie Omo-Agege eye the 2027 Senate presidency race.

Oshiomhole shouted “point of order” persistently, even after his microphone was cut, protesting what he sees as irregularities in the adopted proceedings – a practice binding unless reviewed.

Senate Chief Whip Mohammed Monguno intervened, stating, “I am now invoking the powers conferred on me as the chief whip of the senate for you to return to your seat. Be guided.”

Ignoring the directive, Oshiomhole continued, prompting Akpabio to cite chamber rules.

“The rules and laws governing the Senate Chamber, including its corridors and passages, are clearly defined,” Akpabio declared.

He emphasised his authority, “The senate president is tasked with maintaining order during debates and giving rulings on points of constitutional order when they are raised. Most importantly, he has the authority to interpret the rules—this is clearly stated.”

Akpabio issued a s warning, “Let me emphasise once again, Senator Oshiomhole, if any member becomes unruly in the senate, such a member will be asked to leave. This is the final warning.”

Senator Patrick Ndubueze (Imo North) also raised concerns over an “omission” in Tuesday’s document, claiming a resolution was neither debated nor adopted.

Akpabio dismissed it and pushed through confirmation via voice vote, ruling for the “ayes” despite louder “nays.”

Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *